Value: £320 / $430 USD | €380 EUR
Weight: 264 grams per shoe – Measurement 43
Sizes: 38-47
Color: White
Cleat Compatability: Three bolt
I reviewed the Quoc Mono II biking shoe for my first ever piece of labor with Cyclingnews again in 2022, so when Quoc introduced its newest high-end street biking sneakers, the M3 Air, it appeared solely becoming that I ought to see how they in contrast.
Quoc launched the sneakers alongside a collaboration with Geraint Thomas in March and we first noticed the Welsh star racing within the then-unreleased pair in February.
They prime the Quoc street shoe vary, and have a full carbon sole and two-piece TPU (Thermoplastic polyurethane) higher. The sneakers can be found in white solely and carry a retail value of £320 / $430 placing them price-wise into the finest biking shoe territory.
I have been driving within the sneakers for a number of months now. I’ve used them for brief spins, and onerous chain gangs, in dry and soaking moist climate, in addition to finishing my longest-ever trip in them lately at 178 miles.
The M3 Airs appear to have gotten a good bit of traction post-launch from Quoc’s slick advertising and marketing and are being worn by a number of prime riders together with Ineos Grenadiers captain Thomas. They’re a glossy, white biking shoe lover’s dream, however does the efficiency warrant the value tag?
Design and aesthetics
What’s higher on a dry, summer time’s day than cruising together with some crisp white biking sneakers and socks on? Should you’re of the identical thoughts, the M3 Airs can be proper up your road. Their glossy uppers and pretty minimal design once more remind me of the phrases I used to explain the Mono II sneakers; slipper-like.
They’ve a single silver ‘Quoc’ and ‘M3 Air’ and ‘Q’ brand and that is it. Quoc’s personal dual-closure dials are additionally white, which provides to the clear look. The sneakers include a lightweight pink Quoc shoe bag within the field in addition to three completely different replaceable arch helps to assist riders fine-tune their match.
Design-wise, they use the identical carbon fibre sole because the Mono II. This has a single mesh vent within the forefoot and for reference, the rubber toe and heel pads have been very sturdy and look to be precisely the identical right here. Quoc additionally says the M3 Air was designed utilizing a brand new final, which provides elevated assist on the ball of the foot and house within the toe field.
Picture 1 of 3
The M3 Air makes use of a two-piece TPU laminated higher which options refined, raised horizontal traces, it’s stitched collectively throughout the entrance of the shoe and joined on the rear. There are two massive mesh vents on the entrance of the shoe for ‘most aeration in high-intensity situations’. Apparently, the purpose of aeration got here up so much concerning pro-rider suggestions to assist cut back foot swelling throughout races. The ‘tongueless’ design can be current. There is not a conventional tongue, the shoe materials wraps over the entrance of the foot and actually aids the clear styling.
The perforated sections of the shoe you possibly can see within the photos function this mesh panelling beneath which could be seen when wanting contained in the shoe nevertheless it’s largely coated over by the higher right here. Quoc has additionally launched an all-season toe cowl for the sneakers’ vents in less-than-ideal situations, although I have never examined this as but. You possibly can, in fact, use another toe cowl however it might not cowl the vents as properly.
The twin shoe closure dials sit parallel to one another, a format that jogs my memory of the Specialised S-Works 7 sneakers. The closure wire itself seems to be coated steel wire as a substitute of the nylon used on the Mono II and would not really feel fairly as easy in use. Quoc informed me that it had widened the lace information to enhance foot assist, particularly to create fewer strain factors when sprinting and to be extra responsive.
I can not say I’ve felt any strain from the Mono II in over two years of fixed use and suppose I personally choose the Mono II system. I believe this goes to indicate how completely different riders’ ft are although: what works for one is probably not proper for one more.
Efficiency
I’ve gotten on rather well with the M3 Air sneakers. They give the impression of being nice, have been comfy from the off, fitted properly sufficient and the carbon sole has felt stiff sufficient for my wants. I just like the light-weight and lean building together with the wraparound tongue and so they do really feel gentle on the foot. Like every little thing I check, I’ve finished loads of driving in them and used them in anger, they have not given me a single subject or downside.
The sneakers are pretty slender in match, Quoc says the match is a bit racier, I measured the only real at its widest level at round 91mm. My very own ft are slender too so this hasn’t been a problem for me, however I believe if you happen to want a wider shoe, the M3 Air is probably not good for you. The mesh panel on the within of the foot will really enlarge any width points as it is easy to see and really feel your foot bone format. Shoe match is private although and that is clearly going to range between riders.
The situation of the twin closure dials and coated wire would not really feel tremendous easy to make use of for my part. I really feel you possibly can’t tighten the sneakers down fairly as tightly or evenly as you may want generally, in comparison with a shoe just like the Northave Veloce Excessive which you’ll actually ratchet down. For me, the Mono II nylon wire feels a bit of bit lighter to make use of, I can really feel this carrying one among every shoe to check and I believe the a number of closure factors on the Mono II enable for a barely snugger match. Heel retention feels about the identical because the Mono II for me, it isn’t tremendous cosy however hasn’t precipitated me any points, once more this can be a private one.
White sneakers imply cleansing and I’ve gotten on wonderful cleansing the sneakers up. I’ve used child wipes, non-aggressive ground wipes and a comfortable toothbrush with washing up liquid (dish cleaning soap) after a dirty few hours at RideLondon. The mesh panels will darken which means they are going to want extra than simply wiping however mine got here up good and clear once more after a scrub with an outdated toothbrush. The feel within the TPU higher does imply that you must give the sneakers an honest wipe down or scrub to get them wanting recent once more.
I can not truthfully say I’ve felt a large quantity of cooling from the mesh home windows although this does not imply it is not taking place. I’ve used the sneakers in 20+ levels warmth and for over 10 hours of driving the place my ft did keep comfy. I’ve had a few ethereal moments however I can not say the M3 Airs have taken air flow to a brand new degree. I perceive suppose that is going to be a fairly private factor from rider to rider although.
Worth
The M3 Air retails for £320, which is pricey nonetheless you slice it, and a rise of £50 over the Mono II. £320, nonetheless, is on a par with loads of different premium street sneakers available on the market proper now.
As a fast comparability, they’re cheaper than the top-end Northwave Veloce Excessive and Nimbl Final, a shoe favoured by plenty of Thomas’ WorldTour rivals presently.
The sneakers do really feel good, and have not given me an oz. of bother. I simply do not know in the event that they signify an enormous enchancment in efficiency over the Mono II for the additional £50 spent. The Mono II is being phased out I perceive, so do not anticipate to see it round eternally. Quoc did additionally inform me extra iterations of the M3 can be launched sooner or later.
Verdict
I like the aesthetics the M3 Air sneakers deliver to the desk. I do not suppose my dream biking sneakers could be a lot completely different if I designed them myself.
I’ve discovered the sneakers to be comfy, and have skilled zero hotspots, rubbing or discomfort of any sort and the sneakers have supported my ft properly when driving onerous.
I believe the closure dial placement and the space between the dial and wire loop do not supply as a lot vary of adjustment and result in a much less foot-hugging match than some sneakers. In the event that they suit your ft and be just right for you I do not suppose you will have a problem however if you happen to discover they’re a bit of massive volume-wise in your ft, the adjustment and retention on supply is probably not sufficient and depart you wanting extra.
| Attributes | Notes | Ranking |
| Design and aesthetics | Wonderful aesthetics, significantly if you happen to like white sneakers. I really feel the dial location and effectiveness may very well be a bit of bit higher | 7/10 |
| Consolation | Comfy for me, zero points or discomfort | 8/10 |
| Weight | 264 grams for a 43 is comptetitive, barely heavier than the Mono II on my scales | 8/10 |
| Stiffness | No stifness claims, however the carbon sole goes to be stiff sufficient for many. Uppers are pretty malleable | 8/10 |
| Worth | Costly at £320 however consistent with prime street sneakers lately. Is the £50 leap justified? | 7/10 |
