Pretty early on Monday morning final week I received a name from a radio station: may I come on to debate a examine displaying London is the world’s most congested metropolis, and that is due to cycle lanes. Grasp on, I replied – say all that once more?
Because it turned out, I by no means appeared (another person received the half). However, intrigued, I seemed into the analysis which supposedly confirmed all this. And that was when issues began to get unusual.
Each claims: London being the world’s most congested metropolis, and cycle lanes being a part of the issue – had been everywhere in the media that morning. This included retailers you’ll anticipate (Each day Mail: “Cycle lanes put in at begin of Covid pandemic assist make London most congested metropolis in world”) and a few you’d hope higher of (BBC London: “Cycle lanes blamed as metropolis named most congested”).
And but … each arguments had been seemingly nonsense. They had been based mostly on a report known as the International Site visitors Scorecard by an organization known as Inrix, which sells visitors information.
The primary downside was the declare of London being the world’s most traffic-clogged metropolis, a place no comparable rating has ever given it. One clue got here once I received maintain of the report – it doesn’t even checklist a single metropolis in Asia or Africa. This wasn’t a worldwide examine, it was one based mostly on the place Inrix occurs to function.
Much more of a puzzle was the concept of cycle lanes being no less than partly accountable. The papers carried the identical quotes, from an Inrix worker known as Peter Lees.
“Use of roads is all about provide and demand,” he mentioned. “If the demand goes up however the highway area is being shared with different types of transport, there’s much less tarmac successfully for the vehicles to be on, which then has an affect on the speeds on the highway and subsequently congestion.”
There are two issues with this, the primary and extra urgent being that it reveals a reasonably worrying ignorance in regards to the fundamentals of visitors. I don’t want to rehash many many years of analysis, however the fundamentals are that you may’t liken visitors to water, with the width of the pipe figuring out how a lot can move. Site visitors could be very completely different, as proven numerous occasions via the concept of induced demand.
The second downside is that even the International Site visitors Scorecard doesn’t make this argument. Cycle lanes don’t even get a point out in its 21 pages. So the place did it come from?
Seemingly, it was straight from Lees, who was interviewed by PA Media, the information company. PA included them on Sunday in an embargoed story, which was then picked up by the opposite retailers.
The PA story recognized Lees because the “Inrix operations director” however his official title is definitely “director of operations – media”. He’s head of press, not a visitors wonk.
How did all this occur? Inrix and Lees have been considerably coy. After a number of emails final week, Lees mentioned he may reply queries in writing, which I despatched. However regardless of a number of followups, all I received was digital tumbleweed.
One slight plot twist got here in a tweet which reprinted a reply from Lees to an Imperial School London scientist querying the findings. The No 1 rating for London, Lees mentioned, “signifies a constructive financial rebound [from Covid] for the UK”. Cycle lanes had been talked about amongst “a lot smaller contributory components”. Among the headlines had been “not precisely representing what we mentioned”.
With out eager to get too Hercule Poirot, I feel we’ve a believable sequence of occasions right here. An organization that makes its cash from the auto business, and which is an element owned by Porsche, tries to get some free PR by publicising its analysis in arguably questionable phrases.
The pinnacle of media does an interview and floats the additional, newsworthy idea. Was this a deliberate ruse? Maybe we’ll by no means know.
Both manner, we’ve a pair of myths escaped into the wild, the place they are going to lurk for years, turning up often as proof within the bizarre tradition conflict in opposition to biking. Already one has appeared: a Sunday Telegraph article this weekend arguing in opposition to low-traffic neighbourhoods confidently named London because the world’s most congested metropolis.
What can we do? Not a lot, I supposed, besides merely, and but once more, observe the miserable and slippery slope from press launch to information story to unkillable fantasy in relation to biking tales. I’d wish to suppose some folks would be taught classes from this debacle. However I’m not precisely assured.
